Current:Home > MarketsWith trial starting next month, Manhattan DA asks judge for a gag order in Trump’s hush-money case -Wealth Evolution Experts
With trial starting next month, Manhattan DA asks judge for a gag order in Trump’s hush-money case
View
Date:2025-04-16 23:03:35
NEW YORK (AP) — Prosecutors in Donald Trump’s New York hush-money criminal case asked a judge Monday to impose a gag order on the former president, citing his “long history of making public and inflammatory remarks” about people involved in his legal cases.
The Manhattan district attorney’s office asked that Trump be barred from making or directing others to make public statements about potential witnesses, prospective jurors and members of the prosecution team and their families other than District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
Jury selection in the case is scheduled to begin March 25. The judge, Juan Manuel Merchan, didn’t immediately rule. Messages seeking comment were left with Trump’s lawyers.
Trump is already subject to a gag order in his federal case in Washington charging him with scheming to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
That order was initially imposed in October by the judge overseeing the case and largely upheld by a federal appeals panel two months later, though the court did narrow the initial speech restrictions by giving Trump license to criticize the special counsel who brought the case.
veryGood! (627)
Related
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- A Great Recession bank takeover
- Ryan Seacrest Replacing Pat Sajak as Wheel of Fortune Host
- A timeline of the Carlee Russell case: What happened to the Alabama woman who disappeared for 2 days?
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Inside Clean Energy: Indian Point Nuclear Plant Reaches a Contentious End
- A Bridge to Composting and Clean Air in South Baltimore
- Beating the odds: Glioblastoma patient thriving 6 years after being told he had 6 months to live
- Average rate on 30
- Jack Daniel's tells Supreme Court its brand is harmed by dog toy Bad Spaniels
Ranking
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- The demise of Credit Suisse
- 11 horses die in barbaric roundup in Nevada caught on video, showing animals with broken necks
- Medical bills can cause a financial crisis. Here's how to negotiate them
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- A Bridge to Composting and Clean Air in South Baltimore
- The NBA and its players have a deal for a new labor agreement
- Senate Judiciary Committee advances Supreme Court ethics bill amid scrutiny of justices' ties to GOP donors
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
Utah's new social media law means children will need approval from parents
Lewis Capaldi Taking Break From Touring Amid Journey With Tourette Syndrome
It's not just Adderall: The number of drugs in short supply rose by 30% last year
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
As Lake Powell Hits Landmark Low, Arizona Looks to a $1 Billion Investment and Mexican Seawater to Slake its Thirst
Jack Daniel's v. poop-themed dog toy in a trademark case at the Supreme Court
Coal Powered the Industrial Revolution. It Left Behind an ‘Absolutely Massive’ Environmental Catastrophe